Check out Horst Legal Counsel's weekly update, in which we dive into a recent appellate court decision impacting our clients and the larger legal landscape in California.
Lessons from Torres Campos v. Munoz:
Court of Appeal Affirms Pet Custody Order, Despite Trial Judge’s Reliance on AI-Hallucinated Case Citations Horst Legal Counsel | March…
Jason Horst
Sorokunov v. NetApp:
An Employer’s Arbitration Win on Individual Claims Can Extinguish PAGA Standing Horst Legal Counsel | March 2026 Your company…
Horst Legal Counsel
Proposition 65 Notice Defects No Longer Automatic Case-Killers:
Environmental Health Advocates v. Pancho Villa’s Horst Legal Counsel | February 2026 California businesses that sell consumer products know the…
Horst Legal Counsel
California Court Strikes Down Forum Selection Clause in Consumer Warranty:
What Diaz v. Thor Motor Coach Means for Your Contracts Horst Legal Counsel | February 2026 Picture this: you buy…
Horst Legal Counsel
Grant v. Chapman University:
Marketing “Face-to-Face” Experience Does Not Create Enforceable Contract for In-Person Classes When operations get disrupted, customers look for refunds. Students…
Horst Legal Counsel
Fuentes v. Empire Nissan: California Arbitration Agreement Enforceability Turns on Readability and Ordinary Contract Rules
California arbitration enforceability fights are increasingly won or lost on something that sounds almost too basic to matter: could the…