The “28-Day Shuffle” Just Got a Lot More Dangerous for California Hotel Operators

Horst Legal CounselAppellate Law, Business Litigation, Legal Updates

Horst Legal Counsel | April 2026 If you own, operate, or invest in a hotel or extended-stay property in California, you have probably heard of the “28-day shuffle.” The playbook is familiar: require all guests to check out before they hit 30 consecutive days of occupancy, make them stay away for a few days, and then let them re-register. The …

When the Bank Says “You’re Good to Go,” You Might Still Be on Your Own

Horst Legal CounselBusiness Litigation, Legal Updates, Professional Liability

Horst Legal Counsel | April 2026 Check fraud targeting businesses and professionals has become a routine hazard of commercial life. The scheme is almost always the same: someone poses as a client or counterpart, sends a check that looks legitimate, asks you to wire money once it “clears,” and disappears the moment you do. Banks know this pattern well enough …

California’s False Claims Act Just Got Harder to Dismiss

Horst Legal CounselAppellate Law, Business Litigation

Horst Legal Counsel | April 2026 If your company does construction work for a California city or county, you need to know about a case the Second District Court of Appeal just published. The short version: any private individual with knowledge of fraud against public funds can sue you under the California False Claims Act, and the procedural technicalities you …

The Tort of Another Has Limits:

Horst Legal CounselAppellate Law, Business Litigation, Legal Updates, Real Estate Law

California Businesses Cannot Recover Every Legal Fee in Cascading Litigation Horst Legal Counsel | April 2026 Someone torpedoes your deal. You spend north of a million dollars in court forcing the sale through. You win. Then you sue the people who caused the mess in the first place, and you win again. But the second lawsuit cost you another $841,000 …

AI Hallucinations in California Courts:

Horst Legal CounselAI, AI & Legal Ethics, AI & Legal Technology, Legal Technology

The Rules Now Apply to Everyone Horst Legal Counsel | March 2026 If you have been following California’s growing body of appellate authority on AI-generated legal citations, you have watched the courts build a wall, one published opinion at a time. First came the warnings to attorneys. Then came the sanctions. Then, in Torres Campos v. Munoz, the consequences reached …

Lessons from Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.

Horst Legal CounselBusiness Litigation

Court of Appeal Holds Prior Contract Rates May Still Matter After the Contract Ends Horst Legal Counsel | March 2026 When a contract ends, parties often assume the old deal is no longer part of the story. This case is a reminder that assumption is not always right. In Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., …

Lessons from Torres Campos v. Munoz:

Jason HorstAI, AI & Legal Ethics

Court of Appeal Affirms Pet Custody Order, Despite Trial Judge’s Reliance on AI-Hallucinated Case Citations Horst Legal Counsel | March 2026 Reviewing a judicial order that analyzed parties’ respective rights under AI-hallucinated case law cited and “interpreted” extensively by the parties, the Court of Appeal in Torres Campos v. Munoz felt compelled to publish its opinion in order to send …

Sorokunov v. NetApp:

Horst Legal CounselEmployment Law, Uncategorized

An Employer’s Arbitration Win on Individual Claims Can Extinguish PAGA Standing Horst Legal Counsel | March 2026   Your company compels an employee’s individual wage claims to arbitration, wins on every issue, and confirms the award. But the employee also has a PAGA claim pending in court, seeking civil penalties on behalf of the state and hundreds of other workers. …

Proposition 65 Notice Defects No Longer Automatic Case-Killers:

Horst Legal CounselCalifornia Regulatory Law, Consumer Product Litigation, Proposition 65

Environmental Health Advocates v. Pancho Villa’s Horst Legal Counsel | February 2026 California businesses that sell consumer products know the rhythm: a Proposition 65 notice arrives, the 60-day clock starts, and the company has to decide whether to settle, fix the alleged exposure, or prepare for litigation. For years, defendants have fought back by scrutinizing every line of the pre-suit …